Harmonization of Islamic Law and Local Wisdom: A Methodological Reconstruction of Ijtihad in Family Law Based on Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s Istinbāṭ Approach

Authors

  • Imam Syafi'i Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo, Indonesia
  • Ramdan Wagianto Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo, Indonesia
  • Hawa’ Hidayatul Hikmiyah Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo, Indonesia
  • Irzak Yuliardy Nugroho Universitas Islam Zainul Hasan Genggong Probolinggo, Indonesia
  • Syaikhoni Korea Muslim Federation, Busan, South Korea

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18359276

Keywords:

Family Law; Ijtihad Method; Islamic Law Harmonization; Istinbat al-Taysir; Local Wisdom.

Abstract

This article examines the harmonization of Islamic law and local wisdom in family law issues through the development of the ijtihad method from the perspective of Yusuf al-Qaradawi's istinbā method. Given that contemporary Muslim family issues are increasingly complex, this study emphasizes the need for an istinbāṭ framework that maintains the authenticity of naṣṣ while being responsive to social realities. This study employs a qualitative-normative approach, using usul al-fiqh analysis, and examines al-Qaradawi's key concepts as instruments for integrating local wisdom. Data were collected from exploring library materials related to Yusuf al-Qaradawi's works within the framework of istinbā that was developed. The results of this study show that Yusuf al-Qaradawi developed an istinbā method called istinbāṭ at-taysīr with three types, namely intiqā’iy tarjīhiy, ibdā’iy insyāiy, and intiqā’iy insyā’iy. This method combines as-salafiy, which does not adhere to the opinions of the fiqh schools, and al-mażhabiy, which is guided by the opinions of the imams of the schools, by re-examining the various opinions of the scholars or conducting their own ijtihad and choosing the opinion that provides leniency, provides convenience, is in accordance with the conditions, and combines local wisdom, to realize the greater good. The contribution of this article lies in providing a methodological model to bridge the tension between textuality and contextuality in family law, while offering academics and policymakers a basis for formulating norms that are more just, relevant, and in line with the demands of modern society.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Akbar, Ali. “Metode Ijtihad Yusuf Al-Qardhawi Dalam Fatawa Mu’ashirah.” Jurnal Ushuluddin 18, no. 1 (2012): 1–20. http://dx.doi.org/10.24014/jush.v18i1.695.

Al-‘Arfaj, Abd al-Ilah ibn Husain. Al-Manāhij al-Fiqhiyyah al-Mu’āṣirah Araḍ Wa Taḥlīl. Bairut: Dar al-Rayahin, 2018.

Al-Baihaqiy, Ahmad bin Husain bin Ali bin Musa Abu Bakar. Sunan Al-Baihaqiy al-Kubrā. Makkah al-Mukarramah: Maktabah Dār al-Baz, 1994.

Al-Jawziyah, Ibnu al-Qayyim. `I‘lām al-Muwaqqi‘īn ‘an Rabb al-‘Ᾱlamīn. Riyaḍ: Dār ibn al-Jawzī, n.d.

Al-Qaradawi, Yusuf. Al-Ijtihād al-Mu’āṣir Bayna al-Inḍibāt Wa al-Infirāṭ. 2nd ed. Bairut: Al-Maktab al-Islamiy, 1998.

———. Al-Ijtihād Fi Asy-Syarī’ah al-Islāmiyah Ma’a Naȥarāt Tahlīliyah Fi al-Ijtihād al-Mu’āsir. Kuwait: Dār al-Qalam, 1996.

———. Dirāsah Fī Fiqh Maqāṣid Asy-Syarī’ah Bayna al-Maqāṣid al-Kulliyah Wa an- Nuṣūṣ al-Juz’iyyah. Kairo: Dar asy-Syuruq, 2008.

———. Kalimāt Fī Al-Wasaṭiyah al-Islāmiyah Wa Ma’ālimiha. Kairo: Dar asy-Syuruq, 2011.

———. Min Hadyi Al-Islām Fatāwā Mu’aṣirah. Kuwait: Dar al-Qalam, 1990.

———. Mūjibāt Taghayyur Al-Fatwā Fī ‘Aṣrinā. Kairo: Maktabah al-`Amānah al-‘Ᾱmmah, n.d.

Amin, Kamaruddin. “Nāṣiruddīn Al-Albānī on Muslim ’ s Ṣaḥīḥ : A Critical Study of His Method.” Islamic Law and Society 11, no. 2 (2004): 149–176.

Ar-Raysūni, Quṭub. At-Taysīr al-Fiqhiy Masyrū’iyatuh Wa Ḍawābituh Wa ‘Awāiduh. Bairut: Dar Ibnu Hazm, 2007.

Bagia, Muhammad Andrie. “The Concept of Tamadhhub (Following Madhhab Fiqh) According to Sa’id Ramadhan Al-Buthi.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Hukum Dan Ekonomi Islam 8, no. 1 (2014). https://doi.org/10.21111/ijtihad.v8i1.2588.

Bambang. “Ijtihad and the Dynamics of Islamic Legal Interpretation: An Epistemological Exploration in the Contemporary Context.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 3, no. 1 (2024): 56–67. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17373912.

BP, Sutisna dan Abdurrahman Misno. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam Berbasis Metode Ushul Fiqh. Bogor: UIKA PRESS, 2019.

Fahmi, Mutiara, and Fitiya Fahmi. “Penetapan Nasab Anak Mulā’anah Melalui Tes DNA (Studi Atas Metode Istinbāt Yūsuf al-Qaradāwī).” Samarah 3, no. 1 (2019): 151–176. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v3i1.5024.

Faisar Ananda Arfa. Metodologi Penelitian Hukum Islam. Bandung: CItapustaka Media Printis, 2010.

Gräf, Bettina. “Sheikh Yūsuf Al-Qaradāwī in Cyberspace.” Die Welt Des Islams 47 (2007): 403–421. https://doi.org/10.1163/157006007783237464.

Hamzah, Amir. Metode Penelitian Kepustakaan Library Research Kajian Filosofis, Teoritis Dan Aplikatif. Malang: Literasi Nusantara, 2019.

Harisudin, M. Noor. “The Formulation of Nusantara Fiqh in Indonesia.” Ijtihad : Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 21, no. 1 (2021): 39–58. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v21i1.39-58.

Ibn Khaldūn, Abdurrahmān bin Muhammad. Muqaddimah Ibn Khaldūn. 1st ed. Damaskus: Dār Ya’rib, 2004.

Imran, Helmi, and Karimuddin Abdullah Lawang. “Perkembangan Pola Pemikiran Fiqih Syafi’iyah Dan Peran al-Nawawī Sebagai Pemersatu.” Al-Istinbath: Jurnal Hukum Islam 7, no. 1 (2022): 141–160. https://doi.org/10.29240/jhi.v7i1.4233.

Jafar, Wahyu Abdul. “Fiqh Siyasah Dalam Perspektif Al-Qur’an Dan Al-Hadist.” Al Imarah : Jurnal Pemerintahan Dan Politik Islam 3, no. 1 (2018): 18. https://doi.org/10.29300/imr.v3i1.2140.

Maftuhah, Imat. “Pemikiran Ijtihad Syekh Yusuf Qardawi.” TAZKIYA Jurnal Keislaman, Kemasyarakatan & Kebudayaan 19, no. 1 (2018): 55–71.

Muhajir, Afifuddin. Membangun Nalar Islam Moderat: Kajian Metodologis. Situbondo: Penerbit Tanwirul Afkar, 2018.

Munawir, Aziz, and Sahal Akhmad. Islam Nusantara Dari Ushūl Fiqh Hingga Paham Kebangsaan. Bandung: Mizan, 2015.

Muzainah, Gusti, and Firqah Annajiyah Mansyuroh. “Integration of Islamic Law and Banjarese Customary Law of Inheritance System Tionghoa Muslim Community in Banjarmasin, South Kalimantan.” Samarah: Jurnal Hukum Keluarga Dan Hukum Islam 6, no. 2 (2022): 678–702. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v6i2.12386.

Pauzi, M., Darul Hipni, and Anwar M. Radiamoda. “The Importance of The Ijtihad Jama’i Method in Contemporary Fiqh Formulations.” Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 23, no. 1 (2023): 13–20. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v23i1.1322.

Qardawi, Yusuf. Kaifa Nata’amal Ma’al Quran al-‘Azimi. Kairo: Dar al-Syuruq, 1999.

Santoso, Dri, and Wahyu Abdul Jafar. “Harmony of Religion and Culture : Fiqh Munākahat Perspective on the Gayo Marriage Custom.” Ijtihad: Jurnal Wacana Hukum Islam Dan Kemanusiaan 22, no. 2 (2022): 199–218. https://doi.org/10.18326/ijtihad.v22i2.199-218.

Sebyar, Muhamad Hasan. “Harmonization of Islamic Legal Institutions and Customary Law in Marriage Dispensation Cases at the Panyabungan Religious Court.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 2, no. 2 (2023): 155–174. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i2.7809.

Sulthon, M., Imam Syafi’i, and Auliya Ghazna Nizami. “Contemporary Fiqh in Indonesia: The Dynamics of Istinbāṭ al-aḥkām at Ma’had Aly Salafiyah Shafi’iyah Sukorejo Situbondo.” Ahkam: Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 1 (2024): 119–134. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i1.32174.

Susilo, Edi, Budi Santoso, and Yessy Eka Ambarwati. “Transformation of Contemporary Fiqh through a Collective Ijtihad Approach in Resolving Lineage Issues Arising from Egg Freezing.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (2025): 728–760. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.10403.

Syafi’i, Imam, Ruqoyatul Faiqoh, and Vasco Fronzoni. “Concept of Misaqan Ghalidzan in Contemporary Interpretation of Quraish Shihab Thoughts.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 2, no. 2 (2023): 115–133. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v2i2.7807.

Syafi’i, Imam, and Tutik Hamidah. Maslahah Controvers As Sources, Methods And Objectives (Comparative Analysis Study Of The Four Madhab). 7, no. 1 (2022): 19–38. https://doi.org/10.31538/adlh.v7i1.1642.

Syafi’i, Imam, Tutik Hamidah, Noer Yasin, and Umar Muhammad. “Childfree in Islamic Law Perspective of Nahdlatul Ulama.” Al-Ahkam 33, no. 1 (2023): 1–22. https://doi.org/10.21580/ahkam.2023.33.1.14576.

Syaripuddin, Said. “Maslahat as Considerations of Islamic Law in View Imam Malik.” Samarah 4, no. 1 (2020): 85–106. https://doi.org/10.22373/sjhk.v4i1.6754.

Warren, David, and Christine Gilmore. “One Nation under God? Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s Changing Fiqh of Citizenship in the Light of the Islamic Legal Tradition.” Contemporary Islam 8 (2013). https://doi.org/10.1007/s11562-013-0277-4.

Wibowo, Waskito, Rusli Hasbi, and Ahmed Madi. “Balancing Orthodoxy and Flexibility : Substantive and Accommodative Approaches to Women ’ s Rights in Qaradawi ’ s Fiqh.” Ahkam : Jurnal Ilmu Syariah 24, no. 2 (2024): 311–326. https://doi.org/10.15408/ajis.v24i2.34134.

Yaqin, Ainol. “Yūsuf Al-Qarḍāwī’s Istinbāṭ Method and Its Implementation in the Moderation of Islamic Law.” Al-Ahkam 31, no. 1 (2021): 109–140.

Downloads

Published

2026-01-24

How to Cite

Imam Syafi’i, Ramdan Wagianto, Hawa’ Hidayatul Hikmiyah, Irzak Yuliardy Nugroho, & Syaikhoni. (2026). Harmonization of Islamic Law and Local Wisdom: A Methodological Reconstruction of Ijtihad in Family Law Based on Yusuf al-Qaradawi’s Istinbāṭ Approach. NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies, 5(1), 25–43. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18359276