The Absence of Constitutional Complaints in the Authority of the Constitutional Court Regarding the Protection of Public Benefit Rights in Indonesia

Dinda Rambe

Authors

Dinda Rambe UIN Sunan Kalijaga

Keywords:

Absence of Conitutional Complaints, Impact, Protections of Rights

Abstract

The majority of constitutional complaints that enter the Constitutional Court are constitutional, but because they are not meant to be the authority of legal examination of the 1945 UUD, the Court often rejects them and allows them to take place "justiced delayed". This journal will dig deeper into some of the differences of previous research, namely the impact of the absence of a Constitutional Complaint on the protection of citizens' rights. This research is a library study, using secondary data sources. The research typology used in this study is explanatory. In this study, the study will focus on the theoretical and practical studies related to the impact of the absence of constitutional complaint legal mechanisms in Indonesia. While the data analysis methods used are qualitative, they are more focused on trying to interpret a particular situation. The absence of a legal effort against the constitutional complaint that is within the jurisdiction of the Constitutional Court would diminish Indonesia's legitimacy as a modern democratic state of law because of the absence in the public of legal efforts to question the treatment of the ruling authority that allegedly violates a person's constitutional rights.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Abdul Rasyid Thalib. Wewenang Mahkamah Konstitusi dan Implikasinya dalam Sistem Ketatanegaraan Republik Indonesia. Bandung: PT Citra Aditya Bakti, 2006.

Achmad Ebi Subiyanto. Pengujian Undang-Undang (perkembangan permohonan perlindungan hak konstitusional warga negara dalam praktik). 1 ed. Depok: Rajawali Pres, 2020.

Asmaeny Azis, Izlindawati. Constitutional Complaint & Constitutional Question dalam Negara Hukum. Jakarta: Kencana, 2018.

Asmono Ari. ““Constitutionla Complaint; Urgency and Implementation in Indonesia.” Yuridika 26, no. 3 (2011).

GAFFAR, JANEDJRI M. “Constitutional Complaint dan Pengujian UU.” Sindonews.com, Semarang, 2015.

Handayani, Febri, dan Lysa Angrayni. “Implementasi Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara oleh Mahkamah Konstitusi Menurut Sistem Ketatanegaraan di Indonesia.” Riau Law Journal 3, no. 1 (2019): 44. https://doi.org/10.30652/rlj.v3i1.6252.

Hikmiyah, Hawa Hidayatul. “Efforts to Form Sakinah Families for User Clients Drug Rehabilitation Houses in East Java.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 2, no. 2 (26 Desember 2023): 137–46.

I.D.G Atmadja. Hukum Konstitusi. Malang: Setara Press, 2012.

I.D.G PALGUNA. Pengaduan Konstitusional (Upaya Hukum Terhadap Pelanggaran Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara). Jakarta: Sinar Grafika, 2013.

———. “Yang Terlepas Dari Kewenangan Mahkamah Konstitusi Ri : Pengaduan Konstitusional ( Constitutional Complaint ).” Lex Jurnalica 3, no. 3 (2006): 128–36.

Jimly Asshidiqie. Pengantar Ilmu Hukum Tata Negara. Jakarta: Rajawali Pres, 2010.

Jose Andre Soehalim. “PENGEMBANGAN KEWENANGAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI DALAM PENERAPAN PENGADUAN KONSTITUSIONAL DI INDONESIA.” Lex Administratum VIII, no. 1 (2020).

Kurniawan, Itok Dwi. “The Urgency Of Providing Restitutions For Victims Of Sexual Violence.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 2, no. 2 (24 Desember 2023): 112–17.

Kusmidi, Henderi. “Family Support Obligations From A Hadith Perspective.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 2, no. 2 (25 Desember 2023): 118–26.

Maruarar Siahaan. “Hak Konstitusional dalam UUD 1945.” fakultas Hukum Universitas Kristen Satya Wacana. Salatiga, 2011.

Muhammad Fauzy Ramadhan. “Menggagas Penerapan Constitutional Complaintdi Mahkamah Konstitus.” Padjajaran Law Research & Debate Society 6 (2018): 1–14.

Pasal 17 dan Pasal 18 Undang-Undang Nomor 30 Tahun 2014 tentang Administrasi Pemerintahan, t.t.

“Pasal 24 C ayat 1 Undang-Undang Dasar 1945,” t.t.

Pasal 24C UUD NRI 1945, t.t.

Pujianti, Sri. “Focus Group Discussion Constitutional Complaint Bagi Pemajuan dan Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Warga Negara di Indonesia.” mkri.id, November 2020.

———. “MK Gelar FGD Urgensi Pengaduan Konstitusional Bagi Warga Negara.” mkri.id, 16 November 2020.

PUTUSAN MAHKAMAH KONSTITUSI. “Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 103/PUU-XX/2022,” 2022.

“Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi No 103/PUU-XX/2022 Tentang Uji Materi UU No. 7 Tahun 2020 tentang perubahan ketiga atas UU No. 24 Tahun 2003 tentang Mahkamah Konstitusi,” 45–46, 2022.

Putusan Mahkamah Konstitusi Nomor 001/PUU IV/2006 (t.t.).

Qurrata Ayuni. “Menggaga Constitutional Complaint di Indonesia.” Pusat Penelitian dan Pengkajian Mahkamah Konstitusi Republik Indonesia, 2010, 1-. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-319-31739-7_107-1.

Rofiq Hidayat. “Cerita Penghapusan Pasal Pengaduan Konstitusional dalam RUU MK.” hukum online.com, September 2020.

Shofwan, Muhammad Romli. “Advocacy Of Civil Issues And Strengthening Legal Literacy For Religious Extension Workers Through Preventive And Conflict Resolutions Approach.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 2, no. 2 (24 Desember 2023): 99–111.

Sri Pujianti. “MK Gelar FGD Urgensi Pengaduan Konstitusional Bagi Warga Negara.” mkri.id, 2008.

Subiyanto, Achmad Edi. “Perlindungan Hak Konstitusional Melalui Pengaduan Konstitusional.” Jurnal Konstitusi 8, no. 5 (2016): 707. https://doi.org/10.31078/jk854.

Suparno, Suparno. “Dismissal Of Civil Servants Those Who Commit Office Crimes Based On The Court Ruling Which Has Permanent Legal Force.” NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 2, no. 2 (26 Desember 2023): 127–36.

Wasito Wiwik Budi. “Mahfud: Ada Dorongan Memperluas Kewenangan MK.” mkri.id, 2008.