Legislation on the Use of Artificial Intelligence in European Union Countries
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.233Keywords:
Administrative Legal Protection; Civil Legal Protection; Intellectual Property Law; Liability; Object of Legal Relations.Abstract
This study analyzes the legislative framework governing the use of artificial intelligence (AI) in the European Union, focusing on patterns of legal convergence and divergence, as well as the governance challenges arising from its implementation. The research aims to examine how the EU constructs a harmonized yet flexible regulatory regime capable of addressing the multifaceted risks of AI while promoting innovation. Methodologically, this study employs a qualitative approach through doctrinal legal analysis and policy review, drawing on primary legal instruments, including the EU AI Act, as well as secondary sources such as policy reports and academic literature. The findings indicate that the EU adopts a risk-based regulatory model that classifies AI systems into low, medium, and high-risk categories. While most AI applications fall into low- or medium-risk categories, high-risk systems—particularly those used in sensitive sectors such as healthcare, justice, employment, and finance—pose significant legal and ethical challenges. The study identifies key risks, including algorithmic bias, data privacy violations, and a lack of transparency, alongside broader concerns about accountability and the protection of fundamental rights. Furthermore, although legal convergence is evident in the establishment of uniform EU standards, divergence persists in national implementation, enforcement practices, and institutional readiness across member states. This study contributes to the existing literature by providing a comprehensive analysis of the interplay between harmonization and fragmentation in EU AI regulation. It also highlights the need for adaptive governance mechanisms that balance regulatory consistency with contextual flexibility. Ultimately, the research underscores that effective AI legislation must strengthen accountability, ensure ethical compliance, and foster public trust, thereby aligning technological development with the core values of the European Union.
Downloads
References
Abubakar, Isah Ndakara, Oluwadamilare Harazeem Abdulganiyu, Moad Essabbar, Hajar Saikouk, and El Hilali Alaoui Ahmed. ‘Control Strategies and AI-Based Techniques for Blood Glucose Regulation in Artificial Pancreas System Development: A Systematic Literature Review’. Medicine in Novel Technology and Devices 30 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.medntd.2026.100438.
Bobrytska, Valentyna I., Hanna V. Krasylnykova, Nataliia А. Beseda, Sergii R. Krasylnykov, and Tetiana S. Skyrda. ‘Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Ukrainian Higher Education: A Comprehensive Study of Stakeholder Attitudes, Expectations and Concerns’. International Journal of Learning, Teaching and Educational Research 23, no. 1 (2024): 400–426. https://doi.org/10.26803/ijlter.23.1.20.
Ćemalović, Uroš. ‘Prohibited Artificial Intelligence Practices According to Article 5 of the European Union’s Regulation on AI—between the “Too Late” and the “Not Enough”’. International Journal of Law and Information Technology 32 (2024). https://doi.org/10.1093/ijlit/eaae023.
Chiappetta, Allessia. ‘Navigating the AI Frontier: European Parliamentary Insights on Bias and Regulation, Preceding the AI Act’. Internet Policy Review 12, no. 4 (2023). https://doi.org/10.14763/2023.4.1733.
Corazza, Michele, Generoso Longo, Leonardo Zilli, Emanuele Di Sante, Salvatore Sapienza, and Monica Palmirani. ‘Hybrid AI Enhancing European Drafting Legislation for a Better Regulation’. Int. Conf. eDemocracy and eGovernment, ICEDEG, no. 2025 (2025): 106–113. https://doi.org/10.1109/ICEDEG65568.2025.11081650.
Cuocolo, Renato, Diana Bernardini, Daniel Pinto dos Santos, Michail E. Klontzas, Tugba Akinci D’Antonoli, Luís Curvo Semedo, Robin Decoster, et al. ‘AI Medical Device Post-Market Surveillance Regulations: Consensus Recommendations by the European Society of Radiology’. Insights into Imaging 16, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1186/s13244-025-02146-8.
De Micco, Francesco, Simone Grassi, Luca Tomassini, Gianmarco Di Palma, Giulia Ricchezze, and Roberto Scendoni. ‘Robotics and AI into Healthcare from the Perspective of European Regulation: Who Is Responsible for Medical Malpractice?’ Frontiers in Medicine 11 (2024). https://doi.org/10.3389/fmed.2024.1428504.
Di Noia, Tommaso, Nava Tintarev, Panagiota Fatourou, and Markus Schedl. ‘Recommender Systems under European AI Regulations’. Communications of the ACM 65, no. 4 (2022): 69–73. https://doi.org/10.1145/3512728.
Elena C., Díaz Galán. ‘The legal regulation of Artificial intelligence (AI) in Europe: two decisive (but insufficient) steps of the Council of Europe and the European Union’. Cuadernos de Derecho Transnacional 17, no. 1 (2025): 366–390. https://doi.org/10.20318/cdt.2025.9334.
Fam Eli, Elio, and Enrico Bis Enzi. ‘The new Artificial Intelligence and the problem of its legal regulation. The european strategy and the long legislative process of the AI Act’. Rivista Italiana di Informatica e Diritto 7, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.32091/RIID0224.
Font, Jorge Luis Ordelin. ‘Copyright and training of generative AI systems: transparency obligations and text and data mining in European regulations’. Revista de Internet, Derecho y Politica, no. 42 (2025). https://doi.org/10.7238/idp.v0i42.431327.
Górski, Lukasz, and Shashishekar Ramakrishna. ‘Right to Explanation in Large Language Models: Lessons from the European Union AI Act and General Data Protection Regulation’. IT Professional 27, no. 1 (2025): 34–40. https://doi.org/10.1109/MITP.2024.3518917.
Gstrein, Oskar J., Noman Haleem, and Andrej Zwitter. ‘General-Purpose AI Regulation and the European Union AI Act’. Internet Policy Review 13, no. 3 (2024). https://doi.org/10.14763/2024.3.1790.
Hoven van Genderen, Rob van den, and Rosa Ballardini. ‘AI and Emotional Data Between the Scylla and Charybdis of European Regulation’. Jusletter IT, 2024, 57–66. https://doi.org/10.38023/aa115617-978f-4d5a-93a7-5b9f16005cf0.
Izarova, Iryna, Oksana Uhrynovska, Oksana Khotynska-Nor, Yuriy Prytyka, Oleksandr Bedyukh, and Yuliia Alendar. ‘Advancing Sustainable Justice Through Ai-Based Case Law Analysis: Ukrainian Experience’. Access to Justice in Eastern Europe 7, no. 1 (2024): 127–148. https://doi.org/10.33327/AJEE-18-7.1-a000123.
Katterbauer, Klemens, Sema Yilmaz, Hassan Syed, and Rahmi Deniz Özbay. ‘The Challenges of AI Regulation for the Gig Economy in the European Union’. In Regulating the Gig Economy in the European Union: Challenges, Innovations, and Global Impacts, edited by Rui Alexandre Castanho, Fabricio Pelloso Piurcosky, Andrey Kinyakin, Mario De Martino, and Rodrigo Franklin Frogeri, 125–45. IGI Global, 2025. https://doi.org/10.4018/979-8-3373-6082-9.ch005.
Kauffman, Marcos Eduardo, Marcelo Negri Soares, Kuo-Ming Chao, Tengfei Long, and Welington Junior Jorge Manzato. ‘EU AI Act Regulation: A Study of Non-European Union Manufacturers’ Compliance Preparedness’. Journal of Manufacturing Technology Management, 2026, 1–20. https://doi.org/10.1108/JMTM-07-2025-0657.
Liang, Guangda. ‘Governing the Amorphous: AI, Social Justice, and the Challenge of Future-Proof Regulation’. Social Sciences and Humanities Open 13 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ssaho.2026.102467.
Mach, Martin. ‘DeepSeek as a Precedent – A Test of the Resilience of European AI Regulation’. Pravnik 164, no. 11 (2025): 1068–1111.
Mökander, Jakob, Maria Axente, Federico Casolari, and Luciano Floridi. ‘Conformity Assessments and Post-Market Monitoring: A Guide to the Role of Auditing in the Proposed European AI Regulation’. Minds and Machines 32, no. 2 (2022): 241–268. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11023-021-09577-4.
Mollo, Francesca. ‘The processing of biometric data in the AI Act: intersections between data protection legislation and the new European regulation of artificial intelligence’. Federalismi.it 2024, no. 28 (2024): 91–129.
Paul, Regine. ‘European Artificial Intelligence “Trusted throughout the World”: Risk-Based Regulation and the Fashioning of a Competitive Common AI Market’. Regulation and Governance 18, no. 4 (2024): 1065–1082. https://doi.org/10.1111/rego.12563.
Rasyid, Muh Fadli Faisal, Muh Akhdharisa Sj, Karlin Z. Mamu, Saptaning Ruju Paminto, Wahab Aznul Hidaya, and Abdennour Hamadi. ‘Cybercrime Threats and Responsibilities: The Utilization of Artificial Intelligence in Online Crime’. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 11, no. 1 (April 2024): 49–63. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v11i1.3318.
Saqib, Hafiz Muhammad, and Hira Amin. ‘Comparative Analysis of AI Regulation for Fintech Cybersecurity and Privacy in the European Union and Qatar’. Discover Artificial Intelligence 6, no. 1 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1007/s44163-025-00736-5.
Sharov, Sergii, Serhii Tereshchuk, Liudmyla Romas, Alina Zemlianska, Olga Derkachova, and Antomi Saregar. ‘Accessibility and Responsibility: Use of Generative AI by Ukrainian Students’. TEM Journal 14, no. 4 (2025): 3572–3581. https://doi.org/10.18421/TEM144-62.
Steege, Hans. ‘Impact of the European draft AI regulation on tomorrow’s mobility’. VDI Berichte 2023, no. 2413 (2023): 19–30. https://doi.org/10.51202/9783181024133-19.
Sukindar, Hendrik Kusnianto, Sarikun, Benhard Kurniawan Pasaribu, and Muhd Syahazizamir bin Sahmat. ‘Legal Innovation in Religious Courts: The Potential Utilization of Artificial Intelligence (AI) in Resolving Contemporary Cases’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 3, no. 2 (December 2024): 388–410. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v3i2.8199.
Taki, Mohammad Khabbab. ‘Artificial Intelligence in Bangladesh’s Legal System: Pathways to Smart and Efficient Justice’. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 1 (March 2026): 252–268. https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.158.
Tallberg, Jonas, Magnus Lundgren, and Johannes Geith. ‘AI Regulation in the European Union: Examining Non-State Actor Preferences’. Business and Politics 26, no. 2 (2024): 218–239. https://doi.org/10.1017/bap.2023.36.
Yang, Shu Ching. ‘Integrating Technology Acceptance, Self-Determination, and Self-Regulation: A Structural Model of Generative AI-Supported Learning and Competence’. Computers in Human Behavior 179 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.chb.2026.108933.
Zhu, Yu Peng, Si Qi Liang, Ya Fang Zou, and Han Woo Park. ‘Regulation and Innovation: Unveiling the Quadruple-Helix-Innovation Ecosystem of Generative AI’. Information Processing and Management 63, no. 3 (2026). https://doi.org/10.1016/j.ipm.2025.104549.
Коваленко, Дар’я Олександрівна, and Марина Сергіївна Уткіна. ‘Проблема Правового Регулювання Інтелектуальної Власності На Об’єкти, Створені Штучним Інтелектом’. Нове українське право, no. 1 (March 2022): 197–201. https://doi.org/10.51989/NUL.2022.1.30.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Tetiana Kolomoiets, Maryna Velykanova, Marina Kravets, Hanna Blinova, Oleh Posykaliuk
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
