Interpretation of Regulatory and Legal Acts in Contemporary Contexts: Foreign Experience, Comparative Perspectives, and Pathways for Regulatory Reform

Yevhen Leheza; Oleksandr  Kurakin; Olha Shapovalova; Kateryna Sokh; Artur Makarov

doi:10.5281/zenodo.18727992

Authors

Yevhen Leheza Dnipro Humanitarian University, Ukraine
Oleksandr Kurakin Donetsk State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
Olha Shapovalova Volodymyr Dahl East Ukrainian National University, Ukraine
Kateryna Sokh National Academy of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
Artur Makarov Odesa State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18727992

Keywords:

Case Law; Continental Law; Foreign Experience; Law Enforcement; Legal System.

Abstract

This article examines the theoretical and legal foundations of interpreting regulatory and legal acts in contemporary contexts, with particular emphasis on integrating foreign experience into the Ukrainian legal system. The study aims to identify methodological gaps in domestic interpretative practice and to formulate pathways for regulatory reform aligned with European standards. Employing a comparative legal methodology, the research analyses interpretative approaches across continental systems (Germany and France) and Anglo-Saxon systems (Great Britain and the United States), as well as the jurisprudence of supranational judicial institutions, notably the Court of Justice of the European Union and the European Court of Human Rights. The analysis combines doctrinal examination, case-law review, and systemic legal analysis. The findings demonstrate that the continental tradition ensures coherence, systematicity, and legal certainty, whereas the precedent-based model emphasises flexibility, judicial creativity, and practical justice. In contrast, interpretative practice in Ukraine remains predominantly formalistic, lacks methodological integration, and is insufficiently responsive to the dynamics of European integration. The study substantiates the feasibility of combining domestic legal traditions with advanced European interpretative methods, particularly teleological, systemic, and evolutionary approaches oriented toward the rule of law and human rights protection. It further argues for strengthening the Supreme Court's role in ensuring uniform judicial practice and fostering doctrinal development. The article contributes to comparative legal scholarship by proposing a structured model of interpretative reform that bridges continental and precedent-based traditions. Its practical significance lies in enhancing the quality of law enforcement, promoting harmonisation with European legal standards, and fostering a modern culture of legal interpretation responsive to contemporary regulatory challenges.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Allo, Zet Tadung, M. Syukri Akub, Aswanto Aswanto, Ratnawati Ratnawati, and Andi Muhammad Aswin Anas. ‘Strengthening Dominus Litis Principle for Effective Corruption Case Management in Indonesia: Harmonizing Positive Law and Islamic Legal Principles’. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 12, no. 2 (October 2025): 529–550. https://doi.org/10.29300/mzn.v12i2.8415.

Al-Zawahreh, Mohammad Muslim, and Yousra Ahmed Hegazy. ‘Digital Contracts: Legal Formalities and Contemporary Challenges’. In Studies in Systems, Decision and Control, 227:273–282. Springer Science and Business Media Deutschland GmbH, 2026. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-031-95310-1_22.

Arifin, Ridwan, and Aprila Niravita. ‘Editorial Introduction: Contemporary Issues on Advocacy and Legal Services’. Indonesian Journal of Advocacy and Legal Services 7, no. 2 (2025): 291–296. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijals.v7i2.34008.

Bergomi, Caterina. ‘Exploring Judicial Interpretation: Comparative Law Methodology and the Hybridisation Paradigm’. Global Jurist 23, no. 3 (October 2023): 243–253. https://doi.org/10.1515/gj-2023-0119.

Edgar, Andrew, and Kevin M. Stack. ‘The Authority and Interpretation of Regulations’. The Modern Law Review 82, no. 6 (2019): 1009–1033. https://doi.org/10.1111/1468-2230.12458.

Ferreira, Cristina. ‘The Europeanization of Law’. In One Country, Two Systems, Three Legal Orders - Perspectives of Evolution, edited by Jorge Costa Oliveira and Paulo Cardinal, 171–90. Berlin, Heidelberg: Springer, 2009. https://doi.org/10.1007/978-3-540-68572-2_9.

Greenberg, Mark. Legal Interpretation. 7 July 2021. https://plato.stanford.edu/entries/legal-interpretation/?utm_source=chatgpt.com.

Hopt, Klaus J., Eddy Wymeersch, Hideki Kanda, and Harald Baum, eds. ‘The Combined Code on Corporate Governance July 2003’. In Corporate Governance in Context: Corporations, States, and Markets in Europe, Japan, and the US, 0. Oxford University Press, 2005. https://doi.org/10.1093/acprof:oso/9780199290703.002.0009.

Hryhorash, Olha, Maxim Korneyev, Yevgeny Leheza, Liliya Zolotukhina, and Tetiana Hryhorash. ‘The Development of Small Business as a Source of Formation of Local Budget Revenues in Ukraine’. Investment Management and Financial Innovations 15, no. 1 (February 2018): 132–140. https://doi.org/10.21511/imfi.15(1).2018.12.

Kushnirenko, Ruslan, Yurii Kitsul, Valentyn Tulinov, Oleks, R. Karpenko, and Dmytro Chernolutskyi. ‘Tactical Actions of Police Officers in the Fight against Drug Offenses as a Direct Route to Information and National Security: Administrative and Criminal Legal Aspects’. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research 14, no. 7 (November 2025). https://doi.org/10.4303/JDAR/236458.

Labardini, Rodrigo. ‘Legal Life for the Hinge in Eurasia. Regional Infrastructure Development Amidst Contemporary Challenges’. Anuario Mexicano de Derecho Internacional 26, no. 26 (2026). https://doi.org/10.22201/iij.24487872e.2026.26.19480.

Lapiashvili, Nino. ‘Evolution Of The Scholarship On The Teleological Method Of Legal Interpretation By The Court Of Justice Of The Eu: Some Of The Most Prominent Voices Reviewed2’. Georgian Journal for European Studies, no. 5 (December 2022). https://doi.org/10.52340/gjes.2022.01.10.

Leheza, Yevhen. ‘Foreign Experience in Legal Regulation of Combating Crime in the Sphere of Trafficking of Narcotic Drugs, Psychotropic Substances, Their Analogues and Precursors: Administrative and Criminal Aspect’. Journal of Drug and Alcohol Research 12, no. 4 (May 2023). https://doi.org/10.4303/JDAR/236240.

Leszczyński, Leszek. ‘Legal Interpretation in the EU Law Perspective: General Model and the Context of Penal Law’. Studia Iuridica Lublinensia 33, no. 5 (December 2024): 179–196. https://doi.org/10.17951/sil.2024.33.5.179-196.

Lintang, Hillary, and Elfia Farida. ‘Alternative Resolution of Russia-Ukraine Conflict Based on International Law’. International Journal of Social Science Research and Review 8, no. 1 (February 2025): 208–217. https://doi.org/10.47814/ijssrr.v8i1.2509.

Mashdurohatun, Anis, Eid Abed Alhaleem Maslat Harahsheh, Muhammad Irwan Datuiding, Abun Hasbulloh Syambas, and Prasetiyo Adhi Wibowo. ‘Contemporary Reassessment of Punishment in Islamic and Secular Law: A Comparative Study of Justice and Penal Philosophy’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 5, no. 1 (January 2026): 80–100. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v5i1.11887.

Miles, Matthew B., and A. Michael Huberman. Analisis Data Kualitatif : Buku Sumber Tentang Metode-Metode Baru. Jakarta: Universitas Indonesia Press, 2014.

Oxford Public International Law. ‘Authoritative Interpretation’. https://doi.org/10.1093/law-mpeipro/e3528.013.3528.

Radchuk, Anatolii, Iryna Slavinska, Kateryna Izbash, Wiktor Branowicki, and Tetiana Kozhemiakina. ‘Principles of Law in Legal Regulation of Public Relations in Modern Conditions’. Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 11, no. 2 (August 2023): 403–419. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v11i2.1485.

Sanaky, Mochammad Syafruddin Rezky, Ika Dewi Sartika Saimima, and Vicky Vicky. ‘Russia-Ukraine Disputes Based on International Law’. Jurnal Keamanan Nasional 8, no. 2 (2022): 328–340. https://doi.org/10.31599/z1py9677.

Setyawan, Vincentius, and Bariah Safrut. ‘Rethinking Law and Justice: The Core Principles of Critical Legal Studies against Legal Formalism’. NUSANTARA: Journal Of Law Studies 4, no. 2 (October 2025): 74–85. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17332128.

Smith, Aimee E., Natalina Zlatevska, Rafi M. M. I. Chowdhury, and Alex Belli. ‘A Meta-Analytical Assessment of the Effect of Deontological Evaluations and Teleological Evaluations on Ethical Judgments/Intentions’. Journal of Business Ethics, 7 January 2023, 1–36. https://doi.org/10.1007/s10551-022-05311-x.

Ugli, Kenjayev Amirbek Alijon, Madaminova Durdona Iskandarovna, Abdullayev Khurshid Nazrullaevich, and Kuralbayev Almas Ahmetkarimovich. ‘Contemporary Issues of Transboundary Water Utilisation in Central Asia: Political and Legal Analysis’. Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 33, no. 2 (2025): 493–512. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i2.40449.

Volkova, Yuliia, Bohdan Bon, Anton Borysenko, Yuliia Leheza, and Yevhen Leheza. ‘Crypto Market Experience: Navigating Regulatory Challenges in Modern Conditions’. Al-Risalah: Forum Kajian Hukum Dan Sosial Kemasyarakatan 24, no. 2 (December 2024): 178–194. https://doi.org/10.30631/alrisalah.v24i2.1625.

Widiartana, Gregorius, and Sajjad Hussain. ‘Judicial Pardon in Contemporary Criminal Verdicts: Balancing Justice, Legal Certainty, and the Utility of Law’. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 4, no. 1 (2025): 1–11. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.17346796.

Zeifert, Mateusz, and Zygmunt Tobor. ‘Legal Translation Versus Legal Interpretation. A Legal-Theoretical Perspective’. International Journal for the Semiotics of Law - Revue Internationale de Sémiotique Juridique 35, no. 5 (October 2022): 1671–1687. https://doi.org/10.1007/s11196-021-09837-7.

‘Ошибка 404’. Accessed 21 February 2026. https://leksika.com.ua/19711105/legal/yuridichna_entsiklopediya.