National Security Complex and Networked Securitization in Cognitive Warfare

Alzaki Alzaki; Arfin Sudirman; R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata; Wawan Budi Darmawan; Ola Madallah Aljaafreh

doi:10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.296

Authors

Alzaki Alzaki Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Arfin Sudirman Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
R. Widya Setiabudi Sumadinata Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Wawan Budi Darmawan Faculty of Social and Political Sciences, Universitas Padjadjaran, Indonesia
Ola Madallah Aljaafreh Ajloun National University, Ajloun, Jordan

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.296

Keywords:

Cognitive Warfare; Indo-Pacific Security; Information Warfare; National Security Complex; Securitization Theory.

Abstract

This article examines how cognitive warfare is securitized in Indonesia amid technological disruption and strategic competition in the Indo-Pacific region. Drawing on securitization theory, Just Securitization Theory, and Regional Security Complex Theory (RSCT), the study develops a multilevel analytical framework that connects global, regional, and domestic dynamics. Methodologically, it employs qualitative document analysis of defense policies, doctrinal publications, and relevant academic literature. The findings demonstrate that securitization in Indonesia is best understood as a networked and institutionally distributed process involving political leaders, military organizations, intelligence agencies, cybersecurity bodies, regulatory institutions, and societal actors. The study identifies an expansion of referent objects, extending beyond territorial sovereignty to include democracy, information sovereignty, social cohesion, and ideological stability. It further shows that cognitive warfare has shifted the primary battlespace toward perception, narrative construction, and psychological influence. As a key theoretical contribution, the article introduces the concept of the National Security Complex to capture intra-state dynamics of securitization. This framework reveals that securitization is not only multilevel but also multi-centered within the state apparatus. The study concludes that, although the securitization of cognitive threats is becoming increasingly institutionalized, it remains constrained by normative tensions concerning civil liberties and democratic accountability. By proposing the concept of the National Security Complex, this article also addresses a theoretical gap in RSCT, which has traditionally emphasized inter-state dynamics, thereby enabling a more structured understanding of security contestation at the domestic level.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

A. Paula, Nita. “The Role of the United Nations in Protecting Human Rights in Palestine (The Phase of Post-Al-Aqsa Flood).” Al-Biruni Journal of Humanities and Social Sciences, February 17, 2026, 17. https://doi.org/10.64440/BIRUNI/BIR015.

Abduljabbar, Firas Meshhal, Saad Abdulhameed Shalev, Rami Salih, Oudha Yousif Salman Al-Musawi, and Yurii Khlaponin. “Securitization of Immigration and Refugee Policy in Contemporary Islamic Politics and International Law.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 1 (2025): 64–98.

Adler, Emanuel. “Cognitive Evolution: A Dynamic Approach for the Study of International Relations and Their Progress.” Progress in Postwar International Relations 43 (1991): 56.

Ali, Mahrus, Hamad F. Al-Fahad, and Wasikh Maulana. “Philosophical Foundation, Application, and Controversies of Judicial Pardon in Islamic Criminal Law, Indonesian Penal Code, and the Criminal Justice System of Kuwait.” De Jure: Jurnal Hukum Dan Syar’iah 17, no. 2 (2025): 624–648.

Amin, Khoirul, Devy Indah Paramitha, Mohamad Dziqie Aulia Al Farauqi, and Anita Shalehah. “Managing Power Rivalry: Indonesia’s Perspective and Strategy in Managing Relations with China in the Indo-Pacific.” Dynamics in the Indo-Pacific: From Geopolitics and Geoeconomics Perspectives, 2024, 73–84.

Ardhani, Irfan, Randy W. Nandyatama, and Rizky Alif Alvian. “Middle Power Legitimation Strategies: The Case of Indonesia and the ASEAN Outlook on the Indo-Pacific.” Australian Journal of International Affairs 77, no. 4 (2023): 359–379.

Balzacq, Thierry. “The Three Faces of Securitization: Political Agency, Audience and Context.” European Journal of International Relations 11, no. 2 (2005): 171–201.

Buzan, Barry. “New Patterns of Global Security in the Twenty-First Century.” International Affairs (Royal Institute of International Affairs 1944-), 1991, 431–451.

Buzan, Barry, and Ole Waever. Regions and Powers: The Structure of International Security. Vol. 91. Cambridge University Press, 2003.

Buzan, Barry, Ole Wæver, and Jaap De Wilde. Security: A New Framework for Analysis. Lynne Rienner Publishers, 1998.

Ciută, Felix. “Narratives of Security: Strategy and Identity in the European Context.” In Discursive Constructions of Identity in European Politics, 190–207. Springer, 2007.

Emerson, R. Guy. “Towards a Process-Orientated Account of the Securitisation Trinity: The Speech Act, the Securitiser and the Audience.” Journal of International Relations and Development 22, no. 3 (2019): 515–531.

Floyd, Rita. “Can Securitization Theory Be Used in Normative Analysis? Towards a Just Securitization Theory.” Security Dialogue 42, nos. 4–5 (2011): 427–39.

Gaufman, Elizaveta. “Security Threats and Public Perception.” Cham: Springer International Publishing. Doi 10 (2017): 973–78.

Grahn, Hilkka, and Toni Taipalus. “Defining Comprehensive Cognitive Security in the Digital Era: Literature Review and Concept Analysis.” Journal of Information Warfare, no. 2 (2025).

Jurriëns, Edwin, and Ross Tapsell. “Challenges and Opportunities of the Digital ‘Revolution’in Indonesia.” Digital Indonesia: Connectivity and Divergence 2020 (2017): 275–88.

Kefeli, Igor F., Roman S. Vykhodets, and Olga V Plebanek. “Updating Cognitive Security in a Global Dimension.” Journal of Globalization Studies 16, no. 1 (2025): 39–46.

Kowalkowski, Stanisław, Danuta Kaźmierczak, and Mirosław Laskowski. “Threats to Social Cohesion in Times of New Wars.” Democracy and Security, 2025, 1–24.

Krause, Keith, and Oliver Jütersonke. “Peace, Security and Development in Post-Conflict Environments.” Security Dialogue 36, no. 4 (2005): 447–62.

Kurniawan, Yandry. The Politics of Securitization in Democratic Indonesia. Springer, 2018.

Leheza, Yevhen, Oleksandr Kurakin, Olha Shapovalova, Kateryna Sokh, and Artur Makarov. “Interpretation of Regulatory and Legal Acts in Contemporary Contexts: Foreign Experience, Comparative Perspectives, and Pathways for Regulatory Reform.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 1 (February 2026): 102–22. https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.18727992.

Nagy, Stephen. “Sino-Japanese Reactive Diplomacy as Seen through the Interplay of the Belt Road Initiative (BRI) and the Free and Open Indo-Pacific Vision (FOIP).” China Report 57, no. 1 (2021): 7–21.

Nusi, Mohamad Iswan, David Mulyadi Cokabo, Tarsisius Susilo, Teguh Heri Susanto, and Rudi Firmansyah. “Supremasi Kognitif: Pelajaran Dari Kepemimpinan Global Untuk Doktrin Pertahanan Siber Indonesia.” Jurnal Pendidikan Indonesia 6, no. 11 (2025).

Pedersen, Alex Young, Rikke Toft Nørgaard, and Christian Köppe. “Patterns of Inclusion: Fostering Digital Citizenship through Hybrid Education.” Journal of Educational Technology & Society 21, no. 1 (2018): 225–236.

Prayitno, Arief, and Rudiyanto Rudiyanto. “Defending the Nation in the Cyber Era: Indonesia’s Response to Non Military Security Threats.” Enrichment: Journal of Multidisciplinary Research and Development 3, no. 9 (2025): 3520–3532.

Priangani, Ade, and Willya Achmad. “Middle Eastern Geopolitics and the Transformation of Islamic Law: An Analysis of Islamic Politics in Muslim Countries.” Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 2026, 85–98.

Rahmatika, Azizah Nur. “Strategi Pertahanan Negara Indonesia Dalam Menghadapi Ancaman Artificial Intelligence.” Peperangan Asimetris (PA) 8, no. 1 (2022): 84–99.

Rychnovská, Dagmar. “Securitization and the Power of Threat Framing.” Perspectives: Review of International Affairs, no. 2 (2014): 9–32.

Saeed, Muhammad. “From the Asia-Pacific to the Indo-Pacific: Expanding Sino-US Strategic Competition.” China Quarterly of International Strategic Studies 3, no. 04 (2017): 499–512.

Shinoda, Hideaki. “The Free and Open Indo-Pacific, the Belt and Road Initiative and BRICS.” In Confronting Theories of Geopolitics: Continental and Anglo-American Traditions, 127–38. Springer, 2026.

Shobri, Taufiq, Purnomo Yusgiantoro, Djoko Andreas Navalino, and Sutanto Sutanto. “Legal Framework for Addressing Cybercrime Threats in Strengthening Indonesia’s National Defense and Security.” Trunojoyo Law Review 8, no. 2 (2026).

Siewier, Malwina Anna. “Resilience as a Strategic Pillar of Cognitive Security.” Humanities and Social Sciences 32, no. 4 (2025): 169–83.

Syahrin, Muhammad Alvi. “Conflict of Regulation Norms for Handling of Foreign Refugees in Selective Immigration Policies: Critical Law Studies and State Security Approaches.” Nurani: Jurnal Kajian Syari’ah Dan Masyarakat 20, no. 1 (2020): 67–82.

Tatara, Beny Abukhaer, Suhirwan Suhirwan, and Mochammad Afifuddin. “The Active Defense Strategy of the National Narcotics Board of the Republic of Indonesia in Facing Asymmetric Warfare.” International Journal of Advances in Social and Economics 4, no. 3 (2022): 84–89.

Wang, Shuang, Muhammad Asif, Muhammad Farrukh Shahzad, and Muhammad Ashfaq. “Data Privacy and Cybersecurity Challenges in the Digital Transformation of the Banking Sector.” Computers & Security 147 (2024): 104051.

Wibowo, Sarwo Edi, Ari Hartono, Hendri Kiswanto, Jafirman Torang Avery Louerens, and Henike Primawanti. “Securitization of Cyber Threats to the Indonesian Government: A Study of Cyber Defense Strategy.” Global Political Studies Journal 8, no. 2 (2024): 97–108.