Beyond Punishment: Reformulating Corruption Law Enforcement for State Loss Recovery

Redy Handoko; Ikrar Demarkasi; Rudy Astanto; Slamet Haryadi; Viktoriya Melnykovych; Adi Sulistiyono

doi:10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i2.165

Authors

Redy Handoko Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
Ikrar Demarkasi Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
Rudy Astanto Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
Slamet Haryadi Sultan Agung Islamic University, Semarang, Indonesia
Viktoriya Melnykovych Dnipro State University of Internal Affairs, Ukraine
Adi Sulistiyono Universitas Sebelas Maret, Surakarta, Indonesia

DOI:

https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i2.165

Keywords:

Corruption; Financial Sanctions; Law Enforcement; State Loss Recovery.

Abstract

The enforcement of corruption criminal law in Indonesia has predominantly emphasized punitive measures rather than the effective recovery of state financial losses. This orientation has generated significant challenges in achieving restorative justice, particularly in ensuring the return of assets lost through corruption offenses. This study aims to analyze the weaknesses of corruption law enforcement in the framework of state loss recovery and to formulate a more justice-oriented reconstruction of financial sanctions within corruption cases. The research employs a sociological juridical method with a descriptive-analytical approach. Data were obtained from primary and secondary legal materials, including statutory regulations, legal doctrines, court decisions, and field interviews with law enforcement actors. Data collection techniques involved literature review and interviews, while qualitative analysis was applied to interpret the findings systematically. The results reveal that weaknesses in corruption law enforcement arise from three interrelated dimensions: legal structure, legal substance, and legal culture. Structurally, the police face limited transparency in corruption case handling, the Corruption Eradication Commission (KPK) experiences constraints in investigating state-loss-oriented cases due to insufficient personnel, prosecutors remain hesitant in executing replacement money sanctions, and judicial disparities persist regarding subsidiary imprisonment for unpaid replacement money. Substantively, ambiguities within Article 18 paragraphs (2) and (3) of Law Number 20 of 2001 have weakened the effectiveness of financial recovery mechanisms. Culturally, persistent justificatory attitudes toward corruption continue to undermine legal compliance. This study contributes to the development of progressive anti-corruption law by proposing a reconstruction of financial sanction regulations through extending the payment period for replacement money and establishing clearer subsidiary imprisonment provisions to strengthen state asset recovery and achieve substantive justice.

Downloads

Download data is not yet available.

References

Anwar, Muhammad, and Agus Surono. “Indonesian Obstacles in the Implementation of Assets Confidential Proceedings from Corruption Crimes Overseas Based on the UN Convention AS Set Forth in UNCAC.” Journal of Law, Politic and Humanities 5, no. 4 (March 2025): 2560–2570. https://doi.org/10.38035/jlph.v5i4.1361.

Aprilia Nur Khasanah, Putri, and Indra Kusuma. “Anti-Corruption Disclosure and Earnings Management: A Case In Indonesian Capital Market.” Jurnal Akuntansi Dan Keuangan Indonesia 17, no. 1 (June 2020). https://doi.org/10.21002/jaki.2020.06.

Arimansitompul, Arimansitompul. “Gratification Development in Corruption in Indonesia.” International Asia Of Law and Money Laundering (IAML) 3, no. 1 (March 2024): 17–22. https://doi.org/10.59712/iaml.v3i1.77.

Arpangi, Arpangi, Andri Winjaya Laksana, Hendro Widodo, Toni Triyanto, and Akhmad Suparmin. “Resolution of Industrial Relations Disputes in Court Rulings and the Fair Fulfillment of Workers’ Rights in Indonesia: An Islamic Legal Perspective.” JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 24, no. 1 (March 2025): 51–62. https://doi.org/10.31958/juris.v24i1.13423.

Azam, Muhammad, Anis Mashdurohatun, Angga Nugraha Firmansyah, Muhammad Dias Saktiawan, and King on Putra Jaya. “Harmonizing Contemporary International Commercial Law with Sharia-Based National Legal Systems: A Comparative Study of Pakistan, Turkey, Indonesia, Malaysia, and Saudi Arabia.” MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 4, no. 2 (September 2025): 1074–1096. https://doi.org/10.32332/milrev.v4i2.11334.

Cahyani, Tinuk Dwi Cahyani, and Yohana Puspitasari Wardoyo. “Efforts of Apparatus Law Enforcement in Realizing Restorative Justice in Asset Recovery Results of Corruption.” AMCA Journal of Community Development 2, no. 1 (January 2022): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v2i1.109.

———. “Efforts of Apparatus Law Enforcement in Realizing Restorative Justice in Asset Recovery Results of Corruption.” AMCA Journal of Community Development 2, no. 1 (January 2022): 15–21. https://doi.org/10.51773/ajcd.v2i1.109.

Darussalam, Hidayat, Risfiana Mayangsari, Rasyid Tanjung, Fitri Kurniawati, and Lukas Meier Keller. “Internalising Sharia Economic Law for Sustainable Marine Tourism: Environmental Mitigation Practices on Pahawang Island.” Journal of Nusantara Economy 5, no. 1 (June 2026): 42–55. https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaraeconomy.v5i1.395.

Fauzi, Ahmad, Ariesta Wibisono Anditya, and Mohamad Noor Fajar Al Arif Fitriana. “Recovering Justice Amid Restorative Approach: Finding the Silver Lining in Asset Recovery on Corruption Crimes.” Indonesian Journal of Criminal Law Studies 10, no. 1 (May 2025): 217–238. https://doi.org/10.15294/ijcls.v10i1.5626.

Haryati, Dwi, Anugrah Anditya, and Richo Andi Wibowo. “Pelaksanaan Pengadaan Barang/Jasa Secara Elektronik (E-Procurement) Pada Pemerintah Kota Yogyakarta.” Old Website of Jurnal Mimbar Hukum 23, no. 2 (2011): 328–342. https://doi.org/10.22146/jmh.16192.

Hutasoit, Robbyansyah, and Arpangi Arpangi. “The Ideal Concept of Asset Recovery in Corruption Criminal Acts Based on Progressive Law.” Ratio Legis Journal 4, no. 4 (December 2025): 4256–4572. https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p.

———. “The Ideal Concept of Asset Recovery in Corruption Criminal Acts Based on Progressive Law.” Ratio Legis Journal 4, no. 4 (December 2025): 4256–4272. https://doi.org/10.30659/rlj.4.4.%25p.

Laksana, Andri Winjaya, and Jarot Jati Bagus. “Re-Orientation of Legal Policy For Using of Foreign Workers in Indonesian Justice.” Jurnal Akta 8, no. 2 (July 2021): 109–120. https://doi.org/10.30659/akta.v8i2.15439.

Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Akhmad Ikraam, and Anila Robbani. “The Liability of Criminal Law for Perpetrators of Goods Embezzlement.” Journal of Justice Dialectical 2, no. 2 (December 2024): 70–83. https://doi.org/10.70720/jjd.v2i2.50.

Laksana, Andri Winjaya, Adhi Budi Susilo, Peni Rinda Listyawati, Setiawan Widiyoko, and Toni Triyanto. “Legal Uncertainty in Law Enforcement for Drug Addicts Resulting in Criminal Disparity.” Yuridika 40, no. 2 (2025): 253–270. https://doi.org/10.20473/ydk.v40i2.68153.

Mahmud, Ade, Chepi Ali Firman Z, Husni Syawali, Rizki Amrulloh, and Weganisa. “Keadilan Substantif Dalam Proses Asset Recovery Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 3, no. 2 (September 2021): 227–250. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p227-250.

———. “Keadilan Substantif Dalam Proses Asset Recovery Hasil Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” Jurnal Suara Hukum 3, no. 2 (September 2021): 227–250. https://doi.org/10.26740/jsh.v3n2.p227-250.

Mashdurohatun, Anis, Salomo Saing, Surya Budi Darma, Sobrani Binzar, Denys Denyshchuk, and B. A. S. Faomasi Jaya Laia. “Reconstructing Regulations on Compensation Payments in Corruption Cases Based on the Principles of Justice in Pancasila.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 2 (August 2026): 1202–1225. https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i2.162.

Mashdurohatun, Anis, Mahmoud W. M. Abu Wazna, Mahmoud Elsayed Atyea Abdasmad, and Joman Rabah Mahfouth Alkhatib. “Bridging Formal Legality and Living Law Public Prosecutorial Policies to Achieve Justice.” Contrarius 2, no. 2 (March 2026): 110–136. https://doi.org/10.53955/contrarius.v2i2.272.

Miladmahesi, Rosita. “Dinamika Baru Dalam Pemulihan Aset Akibat Korupsi Di Indonesia.” Journal of Judicial Review 22, no. 1 (June 2020): 14–31. https://doi.org/10.37253/jjr.v22i1.720.

Nurita, Cut. “Asas Beban Pembuktian Terbalik Terhadap Tindak Pidana Korupsi Dalam Sistem Hukum Di Indonesia.” Jurnal Hukum Kaidah: Media Komunikasi Dan Informasi Hukum Dan Masyarakat 23, no. 1 (December 2023): 1. https://doi.org/10.30743/jhk.v23i1.8457.

Pangaribuan, Christine Natalia, Suci Ramadani, and Muhammad Arif Sahlepi. “Criminal Execution Of Payment Of Compensation What The Public Prosecutor Did In The Case Of Corruption.” International Journal of Society and Law 3, no. 3 (October 2025): 416–424. https://doi.org/10.61306/ijsl.v3i3.649.

———. “Criminal Execution Of Payment Of Compensation What The Public Prosecutor Did In The Case Of Corruption.” International Journal of Society and Law 3, no. 3 (October 2025): 416–424. https://doi.org/10.61306/ijsl.v3i3.649.

Risqilah, Iin Karita Sakharina, Abdul Razak, Anggreany Arief, and Anton Smirnov. “From Administrative Correction to Criminal Prosecution: An Escalation Model for JKN Claim Fraud in Indonesia.” Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 5, no. 1 (June 2026): 728–745. https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i1.170.

Rusdiana, Erma, Nurus Zaman, Lindra Darnela, and Uswatun Hasanah. “Preventing The Politicisation of Corruption Crime Law Enforcement Based on Local Wisdom.” Legality: Jurnal Ilmiah Hukum 33, no. 1 (2025): 110–131. https://doi.org/10.22219/ljih.v33i1.37429.

Sahroni, Ahmad, and Mohammad Hazyar Arumbinang. “Reformulate Supervisory Mechanism of The Indonesian Corruption Eradication Commission, Why and How?” Jurnal IUS Kajian Hukum Dan Keadilan 12, no. 3 (December 2024): 558–571. https://doi.org/10.29303/ius.v12i3.1558.

Setiadi, Wicipto. “Korupsi Di Indonesia Penyebab, Hambatan, Solusi Dan Regulasi.” Jurnal Legislasi Indonesia 15, no. 3 (November 2018): 3. https://doi.org/10.54629/jli.v15i3.234.

Setyawan, Donny Haryono, Iyah Faniyah, and Otong Rosadi. “Restorative Justice Approach in Resolving Corruption Cases Based on State Financial Loss Recovery in Indonesia.” Ekasakti Journal of Law and Justice 2, no. 1 (June 2024): 12–26. https://doi.org/10.60034/e060xt69.

Sianturi, Ronald Hasudungan. “Optimizing the Recovery of Corrupt Assets from the Perspective of Economic Rights and Human Security in Indonesia.” Khazanah Hukum 7, no. 2 (May 2025): 121–139. https://doi.org/10.15575/kh.v7i2.44974.

Suhartono, Suhartono, Sudjai Sudjai, Didit Darmawan, Muchamad Catur Rizky, and Pratolo Saktiawan. “The Effectiveness of Criminal Sanctions in Preventing Corruption: A Literature Review of the Indonesian Legal System.” Bulletin of Science, Technology and Society 3, no. 3 (November 2024): 43–48.

Sumiadi, Laila M. Rasyid, and Ikramsyah Irwali. “Corruption Crimes in Indonesia: A Comparative Study.” International Journal of Law, Social Science, and Humanities 2, no. 1 (March 2025): 171–180. https://doi.org/10.70193/ijlsh.v2i1.224.

Tovalini, Krismena, and Yulia Hanoselina. “Behavioral and Cultural Determinants of Corruption: Evidence from Indonesia.” Jurnal Ilmiah Ekotrans & Erudisi 4, no. 2 (December 2024): 12–21. https://doi.org/10.69989/pv810d72.

Wangga, Maria Silvya E., Nadzriah Ahmad, Jufryanto Puluhulawa, and Vifi Swarianata. “Periscope of Ideas Selective Criteria for the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (May 2024): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4530.

———. “Periscope of Ideas Selective Criteria for the Application of Restorative Justice in Corruption Crimes.” Journal of Indonesian Legal Studies 9, no. 1 (May 2024): 1–30. https://doi.org/10.15294/jils.vol9i1.4530.

Zahra, Arsya Yustisia, Ani Triwati, Muhammad Iftar Aryaputra, and Feri Abraham. “Pendekatan Keadilan Restoratif Sebagai Alternatif Penyelesaian Tindak Pidana Korupsi.” JURNAL USM LAW REVIEW 6, no. 3 (December 2023): 1250–1261. https://doi.org/10.26623/julr.v6i3.6758.

Zhytkova, Olesia, Robert Gillanders, and Windkouni Haoua Eugenie Maïga. “The Internal and Transnational Effects of Corruption on the Environment: The Case of Ukraine.” Cogent Social Sciences 11, no. 1 (2025). https://doi.org/10.1080/23311886.2025.2566301.