Peer Review Proccess
- Minimum of two expert reviewers per manuscript
- Double-blind review system (author & reviewer anonymity)
- Strict adherence to academic quality and ethical standards
- Editorial efficiency with continuous monitoring of review progress
- Accepted – Published as submitted
- Minor Revision – Small corrections required
- Major Revision – Substantial improvements needed
- Resubmit – Re-evaluation after major revision
- Rejected – Not suitable for publication
Nusantara Education applies a two-stage evaluation process. First, manuscripts are assessed by the editorial team for scope and quality. If deemed suitable, the manuscript is assigned to an editor who will invite at least two qualified reviewers. The review process is voluntary but monitored to ensure timely responses.
Editors may accept, reject, or request revisions based on reviewer feedback. In some cases, additional reviewers may be assigned. Authors will be notified of decisions and may be required to revise their manuscript accordingly.





