Between Secularising Jurisprudence and Rooted Law: Referential Hybridisation in Contemporary Arab Legislative Discourses
DOI:
https://doi.org/10.66325/nusantaralaw.v5i2.388Keywords:
Arab legislative systems; Hybridisation Islamic Jurisprudence; Positive law; Legal Rooting; Referential Hybridisation.Abstract
The relationship between Islamic jurisprudence (Fiqh) and positive law has become increasingly complex due to the emergence of contemporary legislative models that combine religious legal references with modern statutory frameworks. Despite extensive scholarship on Islamic legal reform, constitutional recognition of Sharia, and legal modernisation, scholars have paid limited attention to how secularising tendencies within jurisprudential thought and the institutional rooting of Islamic legal principles interact to shape contemporary Arab legislative discourses. Accordingly, this study addresses three research questions: how contemporary Islamic jurisprudence has transformed under modern interpretative methodologies; how Arab legal systems have incorporated Islamic legal references into positive legislation through legal rooting; and how the interaction between these developments can be theoretically explained. Employing a qualitative doctrinal and comparative legal methodology, the study analyses classical Islamic jurisprudential sources, principles of Usul al-Fiqh , constitutional provisions, legislation, judicial practices, and relevant academic literature. The findings demonstrate that contemporary Arab legal systems have not followed a linear process of either secularisation or Islamization; rather, they have developed through a dynamic interaction between jurisprudential transformation and legislative integration. The study further reveals that this interaction produces a distinct phenomenon of referential hybridisation, characterised by methodological exchange, conceptual convergence, and institutional adaptation between Islamic jurisprudence and positive law. This research contributes by proposing referential hybridisation as a theoretical framework for understanding legally plural systems where multiple sources of authority coexist. This framework provides a new perspective for comparative legal studies and offers analytical tools for examining the future development of legislative systems operating between religious legitimacy and modern state authority.
Downloads
References
Abdullah, Abdullah Hemmet. ‘Renewal and Ijtihad Practices: An Analytical Study in Light of the Objectives of Islamic Sharia’. Journal of Scientific Development, ‘for Studies and Research’ (JSD) 6, no. 21 (10 June 2025). doi:10.61212/jsd/336.
Ahmed, Habib. ‘Islamic Normative Legal Theory: Framework and Applications’. Journal of Law and Religion 40, no. 1 (January 2025): 28–58. doi:10.1017/jlr.2025.10056.
Alaloosh, Mahmood, Govar Majed Ahmad, and Lara Adel Jabbar. ‘Adapting Iraqi Law to Smart Contracts: A Comparative Analysis Incorporating Islamic Law Principles and Consumer Protection in the Contemporary Digital Era’. MILRev: Metro Islamic Law Review 5, no. 1 (27 February 2026): 210–246. doi:10.32332/milrev.v5i1.13031.
Al-Alwani, T. J. Islah Al-Fikr al-Islami: Madkhal Ila Nizam al-Khitab Fi al-Fikr al-Islami al-Mu’asir. Cairo, Egypt: Dar Al-Salam., 2010.
Al-Ashmawi, M. S. Al-Islam al-Siyasi. Cairo, Egypt: Sina Publishing., 2004.
Al-Haqqawi, B. Mudawwanat Al-Usra al-Maghribiyya: Qira’a Fi al-Ijtihad al-Tashri’i. Ministry of Justice Publications., 2010.
Al-Jabr, M. B. A. Tatbiq Al-Sharia al-Islamiyya Fi al-Nizam. al-saudi. Riyadh: Dar Al-Obeikan., 2015.
Al-Messiri, A. W. Al-Falsafa al-Maddiyya Wa Tafkik al-Insan. Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr., 2002.
Al-Qaradawi, Y. Dirasa Fi Fiqh Maqasid Al-Sharia Bayn al-Maqasid al-Kulliyya Wa al-Nusus al-Juz’iyya. Dar Al-Shorouk., 2006.
Al-Sanhuri, A. R. Masadir Al-Haqq Fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Cairo, Egypt: Dar Al-Nahda Al-Arabiyya., 1998.
Al-Sharfi, A. M. Al-Islam Wa al-Hadatha. : Tunis: Tunisian Publishing House., 1998.
Al-Turabi, H. Tajdid Al-Fikr al-Islami. Khartoum: Sudanese Book House., 1987.
Al-Zarqa, M. A. Al-Madkhal al-Fiqhi al-‘amm. Damascus: Dar Al-Qalam., 1999.
Al-Zuhayli, W. Al-Ahwal al-Shakhsiyya Fi al-Fiqh al-Islami. Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr., 2002.
———. Al-Fiqh al-Islami Wa Adillatuh. Damascus: Dar Al-Fikr., 1989.
Ariyanti, Vivi and Supani. ‘Examining Muslims’ Aspirations in Drafting the New Criminal Code: Analyzing Criminal Law Policy in Indonesia from a Maslaha Perspective’. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam 18 (16 March 2024): 37–58. doi:10.24090/mnh.v18i1.8280
Athambawa, Mahroof. ‘Ijtihād Maqāṣidī and Legal Adaptation: A Comparative Analysis of Contemporary Islamic Jurisprudence in Responding to Emerging Issues’. Mazahibuna: Jurnal Perbandingan Mazhab, 1 June 2025, 89–103. doi:10.24252/mazahibuna.vi.54378.
Ayoub, Samy. ‘The Egyptian State as a Muǧtahid: Law and Religion in the Jurisprudence of the Egyptian Supreme Constitutional Court’, 21 June 2022. doi:10.1163/15730255-bja10119.
———. ‘The Ottoman Rationale for Codification: The Mecelle’, 129–53, 2019. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190092924.003.0005.
Ayoub, Samy A. ‘The Ottoman Rationale for Codification: The Mecelle’. In Law, Empire, and the Sultan: Ottoman Imperial Authority and Late Hanafi Jurisprudence, edited by Samy A. Ayoub, 0. Oxford University Press, 2019. doi:10.1093/oso/9780190092924.003.0005.
Baba, Awat Mohamed Agha, and Ihsan Abdulmonem Abdulhadi Samara. ‘The Renewal of Islamic Jurisprudence Between Originality and Modernity: A Comparative Study: ت’. International Journal of Fiqh and Usul Al-Fiqh Studies 7, no. 1 (30 January 2023): 6–17. doi:10.31436/ijfus.v7i1.282.
Bambang. ‘Ijtihad and the Dynamics of Islamic Legal Interpretation: An Epistemological Exploration in the Contemporary Context’. Nusantara: Journal of Law Studies 3, no. 1 (31 July 2024): 56–67. doi:10.5281/zenodo.17373912.
Belqaziz, A. Al-Dawla Wa al-Din Fi al-Ijtima’ al-‘arabi al-Islami. Beirut, Lebanon: Center for Arab Unity Studies., 2018.
Bin Bayyah, A. Sina’at al-Fatwa Wa Fiqh al-Aqalliyyat. Jeddah: Dar al-Minhaj., 2007.
Cholily, Naufal, Mahbub Ghozali, Abd Kholid, Wan Khairul Aiman Wan Mokhtar, and Rami İbrahim Mahmut. ‘Bridging Fiqh and Religious Practice: Actualizing the Function of Ḥāshiyah as a Form of Worship in the Scribal Traditions of Madurese Pesantren Literature’. Journal of Islamic Law 6, no. 1 (2 February 2025): 21–45. doi:10.24260/jil.v6i1.3749.
Daraz, M. A. Al-Din: Buhuth Mumahhada Li-Dirasat Tarikh al-Adyan. Kuwait: Dar Al-Qalam., 1991.
El-Gamal, M. A. Islamic Finance: Law, Economics, and Practice. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2006.
Fatarib, Husnul, Zezen Zainul Ali, Nur Aziz Arifin, Abdul Najib, and Muhammad Nur Fathoni. ‘Progressive Legal Reasoning in Contemporary Islamic Legal Reform: Negotiating the Maqāṣid and Hermeneutic Approaches’. JURIS (Jurnal Ilmiah Syariah) 24, no. 2 (17 December 2025): 277–294. doi:10.31958/juris.v24i2.16123.
Hallaq, W. B. Sharī’a: Theory, Practice, Transformations. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2009.
Hamid, E. Electronic Agent. Raya Higher Institute of Management and Foreign Trade, 2020.
Hammad, N. Mu’jam al-Mustalahat al-Maliyya Wa al-Iqtisadiyya Fi Lughat al-Fuqaha’. Damascus: Dar Al-Qalam., 2006.
Hanafi, H. Al-Din Wa al-Thawra Fi Misr : Cairo, Egypt: Maktabat Madbouli., 2012.
Jaelani, Abdul Kadir, Dostonjon Murodullayev, Nabila Khanan Mulachela, Andi Tri Haryono, and Sarjiyanto. ‘Social Justice Fiqh and Decent Living Needs: Reinterpreting Minimum Wage Policy in Indonesia’. Journal of Islamic Law 7, no. 2 (25 August 2026): 361–398. doi:10.24260/jil.v7i2.6742.
Kamali, Mohammad Hashim. Maqasid Al-Shari’ah: Ijtihad and Civilization Renewal. o c c as i o n a l pa p e rs s e r i e s 2 0. malaysia: International Institute of Advanced Islamic Studies, 2012. https://iiit.org/en/book/maqasid-al-shariah-ijtihad-and-civilization-renewal/.
Khdir, Rebaz Rasul. ‘The Constitutional Status of Islam in the Iraqi Legal Order’. Journal of Legal and Political Studies 12, no. 2 (4 May 2025): 226–262. doi:10.17656/jlps.10267.
Lombardi, Clark B. ‘Constitutional Provisions Making Sharia “a” or “the” Chief Source of Legislation: Where Did They Come From? What Do They Mean? Do They Matter?’, 2013. https://digitalcommons.law.uw.edu/faculty-articles/713.
Mallat, C. Introduction to Middle Eastern Law. Oxford: Oxford University Press., 2007.
Mustakim, Mustakim, Mas Prasetyo, Dayanto Dayanto, Kartika Jingga, and Ziyad Ravaşdeh. ‘Integration of Islamic Law in Constitutional Judicial Review: Comparative Perspectives from Indonesia and Turkey’. Jurnal Ilmiah Mizani: Wacana Hukum, Ekonomi Dan Keagamaan 13 (15 May 2026): 322. doi:10.29300/mzn.v13i1.10114.
Nasoha, Ahmad Muhamad Mustain, Ashfiya Nur Atqiya, Imam Abdullah, Muhammad Nur Ukasyah, and Viror Ghufron Assaifi. ‘Criminal Law in Muslim-Majority Countries: Balancing Sharia, Human Rights, and Global Standards’. SHAHIH: Journal of Islamicate Multidisciplinary 10, no. 1 (2 June 2025): 1–18. doi:10.22515/shahih.v10i1.10038.
Nasrullah, Moh Najib, Uu Nurul Huda, and Enceng Arif Faizal. ‘Reconstructing the Indonesian Legal System through the Lens of Maṣlaḥah Mursalah’. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 23 June 2025, 117–132. doi:10.24090/mnh.v19i1.7861.
Otto, J. M. Sharia Incorporated: A Comparative Overview of the Legal Systems of Twelve Muslim Countries in Past and Present. Leiden: Leiden University Press., 2010.
Parolin, Gianluca. ‘A Second Violation of the Sharia Provision: Egypt’s SCC ’s Ruling of 12 May 2013, in the Case No. 37/ Xxxiii (Annotated and Translated)’. Arab Law Quarterly, 2024. doi:10.1163/15730255-bja10166.
Peters, R. Crime and Punishment in Islamic Law: Theory and Practice from the Sixteenth to the Twenty-First Century. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press., 2005.
Majalla.org. ‘Report of the Commission Appointed to Draft the Majalla’, 31 January 2022. https://majalla.org/ilm/majalla/.
Sunaryo, Agus, and Ahmad Hadidul Fahmi. ‘Evaluation of the Maqāṣid Al-Sharī’ah Liberalization: An Examination of the Notion of “Prioritizing Public Interest over Textual Evidence”’. Al-Manahij: Jurnal Kajian Hukum Islam, 13 March 2024, 1–16. doi:10.24090/mnh.v18i1.9886.
Taha, A. R. Ruh Al-Hadatha: Al-Madkhal Ila Ta’sis al-Hadatha al-Islamiya. Beirut, Lebanon: Arab Cultural Center., 2007.
Tewari, Ritika. ‘Linguistic Markers Of Judicial Reasoning In Indian Judgments’ 4, no. 4 (2024).
Tomagola, Ardy Gunawan, Wahid Yaurwarin, Jakobus Anakletus Rahajaan, Agustinus Jonas Sahetapy, and Reni Wahyuni Kalauw. ‘The Effectiveness of Indonesia’s Anti-Corruption Law on Legal Reform and Implementation | West Science Law and Human Rights’, 31 July 2024. https://wsj.westsciences.com/index.php/wslhr/article/view/1129.
Vogel, F. E. (). Islamic Law and Legal System: Studies of Saudi Arabia. Leiden: Brill., 2000.
Zubair, Dr Hafiz Muhammad Zubair Muhammad. ‘An Introduction to The Ottoman Civil Code’. Majallah-e-Talim o Tahqiq 2, no. 1 (31 March 2020). https://ojs.cer.edu.pk/index.php/mtt/article/view/81.
Downloads
Published
Issue
Section
License
Copyright (c) 2026 Jamal Imran Hassan
This work is licensed under a Creative Commons Attribution-ShareAlike 4.0 International License.
